Post-lingual 65+
This section outlines the benefits after cochlear implantation, challenges of hearing loss above 65 and factors influencing post operative results.ย
Each publication listed below is rated by its importance for patients, using a Hearringย key icon scale ๐โย e.g.ย one key for low importance, three keys for medium importance, and five keys for high importance.ย
๐
low importance for patients
๐๐๐๐๐
the highest importance for patients
Challenges
of hearing loss for adults
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIt is well known that hearing loss has a considerable impact on individualsโ daily life, untreated hearing loss can lead to communication problems, social isolation, loneliness, and higher anxiety and depression rates.โ (Vandenbroeke et al. 2025)
โ
2.ย โIn hearing-impaired patients, the listening effort required to improve communication leads to mental fatigue with a negative effect on cognitive resources being available for other cognitive tasks, resulting in cognitive decline.โ (Mosnier et al. 2015)
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย Progressive age-related hearing loss not only affects speech understanding and daily communication, but also social functioning.โ (Lammers et al. 2025)
โ
2.ย โThe impact that even mild to moderate hearing loss, when unaddressed, has on individualโs ability to enjoy life to the full should not be underestimated: As well as listening and communication, hearing loss can affect mental health, social integration and employment.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โThe impact that even mild to moderate hearing loss, when unaddressed, has on individualโs ability to enjoy life to the full should not be underestimated: As well as listening and communication, hearing loss can affect mental health, social integration and employment.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIt is well known that hearing loss has a considerable impact on individualsโ daily life, untreated hearing loss can lead to communication problems, social isolation, loneliness, and higher anxiety and depression rates.โ (Vandenbroeke et al. 2025)
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIn the past two decades there is accumulating evidence indicating that untreated hearing loss is associated with a higher risk of cognitive decline and dementia. In 2020, and again in their 2024 update, the Lancet Commission on Dementia concluded that hearing loss is the most important modifiable risk factor for dementia.โ (Lammers et al. 2025)
More:ย Jafari et al. 2019,ย Bai et al. 2025
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โDue to changes in communication patterns, quality of life is strongly reduced in hearing-impaired subjects. According to the National council on the Aging Report comprising 4394 participants only 39% of hearing-impaired elderly have an excellent health compared to 68% in the general population.โ (Vรถlter et al. 2020)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIt is well known that hearing loss has a considerable impact on individualsโ daily life, untreated hearing loss can lead to communication problems, social isolation, loneliness, and higher anxiety and depression rates.โ (Vandenbroeke et al. 2025)
More:ย Cosh et al. 2019,ย Zhao et al. 2025
๐๐๐๐
1.โThis research study shows that spouses of older people with hearing impairment experience third-party disability as a result of their partnersโ hearing impairment and that the SOS-HEAR could be used to identify the nature of the disability.โย (Scarinci et al. 2012)
2.โHearing loss poses a significant public health challenge among older adults, necessitating urgent interventions such as early screening, expanded access to hearing aids, and environmental noise control.โ (Qingchun et al. 2025)
Benefits
after cochlear implantation
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โThis prospective study demonstrates that cochlear implantation improves speech perception in an elderly population in quiet and in noise at 6 months after implantation, which is consistent with previously reported research. Speech perception continues to improve in quiet between 6 and 12 months, and was shown to remain stable for performance in noise after 6 months.โ
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โOur results suggest that, by improving hearing for verbal communication, cochlear implantation decreases the cognitive load and, as a consequence, may have a positive effect on attention, concentration, and executive function.โ (Mosnier et al. 2015)
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIn particular, โSocial participationโ as a treatment success directly experienced by the patient reaches the level of the general population within only 6 months postoperatively and even exceeds this level 6 years after CI treatment.โ (Issing et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐๐
1.ย โOur study data demonstrate a rapid and stable improvement in quality of life over the 6 years in elderly patients over the age of 65.โ (Issing et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โBetter hearing not only improved individualsโ ability to communicate verbally, but also their ability to function independently on a daily basis.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โ20% of the subjects aged 65โ85 years had an abnormal score on at least three out of six subtests before CI provision; this decreased to only 5% after cochlear implantation. In general, cognitive functions significantly improved at six or at 12 months of CI use (22, 24).โ (Vรถlter et al. 2022)
โ
โ
More:ย Claes et al. 2018,ย Vasil et al. 2020,ย Zhan et al. 2020
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โThey appeared to feel less lonely and felt less handicapped by their hearing loss. Clinically and statistically significant gains in health utility, independence, loneliness, hearing ability and hearing handicap were observed regardless of young, middle or old old age group.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โPartners described being less concerned about the safety of the CI recipient, a reduction in the need for them to act as an interpreter for their spouse, and a reduction in stress associated with caring for their partner following cochlear implantation. Cochlear implantation has been found to enhance autonomy, normalcy, and social life satisfaction for CI recipients and, importantly, their partners.โ
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โAfter 1 year of CI use, the mean depression scores decreased significantly in both age groups: from 5.8ยฑ4.3 to 4.4ยฑ4.2 in the<60y group and from 7.3ยฑ5.3 to 6.3ยฑ4.4 in theโฅ60y group (Fig. 5C). A decrease in the depression scores was reported by 82% of participants in the<60 group and by 50% in the โฅ60y group.โ
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โBetter hearing not only improved individualsโ ability to communicate verbally, but also their ability to function independently on a daily basis.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โBetter hearing not only improved individualsโ ability to communicate verbally, but also their ability to function independently on a daily basis.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โBetter hearing not only improved individualsโ ability to communicate verbally, but also their ability to function independently on a daily basis.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
๐๐๐
1.ย โBetter hearing not only improved individualsโ ability to communicate verbally, but also their ability to function independently on a daily basis.โ (Cuda et al. 2024)
Influencing Factors
Post-operative results
๐๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โThe candidateโs family and friends should be encouraged to become involved in all aspects of pre- and post-implant management. This should be done only with the permission of the candidate and at the discretion of the CI team.โ (Tรกvora-Vieira 2020)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โFigure 2ย shows postoperative CNC word score as a regression on duration of deafness. When we took both age groups together, there was a general decrease in word score with increasing duration of deafness.โ (Leung et al 2005)
ย
2.ย โDoD [duration of deafness] is one of the most important factors to predict speech perception after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf patients. The meta-analyses revealed a negative correlation between length of auditory deprivation and postoperative sentence and monosyllabic speech perception. Longer DoD seems to lead to worse CI performance, whereas more experience with CI mitigates the effect.โ (Bernhard et al. 2021)
ย
3.ย โBased on the present findings, it can be concluded that the underlying etiology and the duration of deafness are important predictors for speech outcome in SSD patients.โ
ย
More:ย Sanchez-Cuadrado 2013
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โSeveral authors have posited that hours of auditory input or CI use per day have a significant effect on socialization and other psychosocial outcomes [26, 33].โ (Marx et al. 2020)
ย
More:ย Giroud et al 2017
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โRehabilitation of hearing communication through cochlear implantation in elderly patients results in improvements in speech perception and cognitive abilities and positively influences their social activity and quality of life.โ (Mosnier et al. 2015)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โHowever, if the elderly suffer from comorbidities, an influence on postoperative speech comprehension can be suspected, especially if multimorbidities or neurological comorbidities are present.โ (Illg et al. 2022)
ย
2.ย โDer Erfolg einer Cochlea-Implantat (CI)-Versorgung kann durch verรคnderte kognitive Fรคhigkeiten beeintrรคchtigt sein.โ (Illg et al. 2018)
๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIn our study, the improvement was slightly greater for patients who underwent CI before 70 years of age than in those implanted later in life, but the difference was not significant. Interestingly, a significant negative correlation existed between age and the speech perception of disyllables without lipreading and with masking. This finding indicates that the older the patientยดs age at CI, the worse the speech perception in noise.โ (Sanchez-Cuadrado et al. 2013)
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โIndividuals may choose to ignore HL as it may represent a stigma associated with getting old. Additionally, HL is considered a normal part of aging and, therefore, not worth reporting. These reasons highlight the importance, and urgency, to uncover and confirm the most promising methods and techniques that support healthy aging, especially by addressing currently available treatments that may modify debilitating effects such as HL.โ (Marx et al. 2020)
๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โSeven studies found no significant correlation between insertion depth and speech perception outcomes (9,22,31,37,41,42,44).
Fifteen studies reported a positive effect or significant positive correlation between insertion depth and speech perception (11,13,29,30,32โ36,38โ40,43,45,46) (Table 2).โ (Breitsprecher et al. 2023)
ย
2.ย โLonger electrode insertions (and greater insertion angles) appear to offer better speech perception performance in the early postactivation period when using the same implant system.โ (Buchman et al. 2014)
๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐
1.ย โComorbidities without cognitive or neurological involvement (e.g., heart insufficiency and limited motor skills) also lead to less speech comprehension postoperatively. The more comorbidities an elderly person has, the less the postoperative speech comprehension develops with CI.โ (Illg et al. 2022)
๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐
1.ย โThe impact of etiology and duration of deafness on speech perception outcomes in SSD patients | European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngologyโ (Kurz et al.)
๐๐๐
๐๐๐
1.ย โIn this paper, we describe very close matches to CI sound quality, i.e., similarity ratings of 9.5 to 10 on a 10-point scale, by ten patients fit with a 28โmm electrode array and MED EL signal processing.โ (Dorman et al. 2024)